Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 15:12:38 -0600 From: Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> To: Shawn Webb <shawn.webb@hardenedbsd.org> Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Return of config files to ^/etc Message-ID: <CACNAnaFQfqhW1xoXX_Xwhp4PTaC=xJ1P_C17=dHHH825eiOC7w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20200215200353.xdmx4fq3fmgaeq2s@mutt-hbsd> References: <CACNAnaH66TNTYB_0BvRhcpDwC8f=OUycwb9=kuqvr2QVRNOqLg@mail.gmail.com> <202002151936.01FJaUj4048415@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> <20200215200353.xdmx4fq3fmgaeq2s@mutt-hbsd>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 2:04 PM Shawn Webb <shawn.webb@hardenedbsd.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 11:36:30AM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > > I'm curious how long downstream projects would need to support both > > > > paradigms. > > > > > > > > > > The answer for both downstreams and us is "however long stable/12 is > > > supported" for that particular project. > > > > As of now downstreams that support stable/11 are already > > in the position of having to support both. > > Not all downstreams support stable/11 anymore, HardenedBSD being one > of them. > > I'm not against reverting back to the old behavior, but I need to know > what additional long-term tasking to add to my plate. > Ideally, we will get this merged back to stable/12 (which should be possible in any event, it's just a matter of how much effort I'll need to put into it) and ease the burden of all involved -- those who still support stable/11, and those who would support 12/13. Thanks, Kyle Evans
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACNAnaFQfqhW1xoXX_Xwhp4PTaC=xJ1P_C17=dHHH825eiOC7w>