Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 15:35:19 +0200 From: Peter van Dijk <peter@dataloss.nl> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bridges Message-ID: <20050924133519.GI17888@dataloss.nl> In-Reply-To: <200509241525.16173.max@love2party.net> References: <200509241525.16173.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--CEUtFxTsmBsHRLs3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 24, 2005 at 03:25:06PM +0200, Max Laier wrote: > Objections against soon retirement of bridge.c in HEAD? One argument in favour of retirement: last time I checked (FreeBSD 6.0-BETA2 I think), bridge.ko is a recipe for instant panic on sparc64. Although now I wonder whether the same is still true for ng_bridge. I'm a happy if_bridge user now :) Cheers, Peter --=20 peter@dataloss.nl | ~ tonight tonight, what is this potion http://blog.dataloss.nl/ | ~ that makes a fool of me UnderNet/#clue | Wayfinder, fr-025 soundtrack --CEUtFxTsmBsHRLs3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDNVYV7JEU4tMwuvwRArZXAKDI1gxe/1ks1BQFXBFDG7GfI0HmQQCfQILo 40PERn0Q0HkT9le0QXlbkGo= =G6Sj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CEUtFxTsmBsHRLs3--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050924133519.GI17888>