Date: Sun, 2 Mar 1997 17:53:35 -0500 (EST) From: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu> To: scrappy@hub.org (The Hermit Hacker) Cc: hasty@rah.star-gate.com, ejs@bfd.com, jmb@freefall.freebsd.org, jkh@time.cdrom.com, taob@risc.org, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge) Message-ID: <199703022253.RAA01169@crh.cl.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970302184847.9863L-100000@thelab.hub.org> from The Hermit Hacker at "Mar 2, 97 06:49:54 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sun, 2 Mar 1997, Amancio Hasty wrote:
>
> > Which brings the interesting point since gcc in 3.0-current is inefficient
> > should we also recompile msun on a 2.1 system for PPRO systems?
> > Who knows we may be able to break the 400k keys/sec before the end
> > of the day 8)
> >
> This all kinda becomes irrelevant when the new code comes out,
> no? :)
Not really, we can give back our information to them so they gen the correct
binary.
-Crh
Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@msu.edu
http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703022253.RAA01169>