Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 12 May 2006 19:14:50 +0400
From:      Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>
To:        Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: Do we need a few more ports reviewers/committers?
Message-ID:  <58836501@srv.sem.ipt.ru>
In-Reply-To: <4464A2BF.6060108@mac.com> (Chuck Swiger's message of "Fri, 12 May 2006 10:59:11 -0400")
References:  <20060509004620.3a8ed7a1@serene.no-ip.org> <20060512035553.GB27663@soaustin.net> <51637568@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <44645A12.3040207@FreeBSD.org> <69557175@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20060512105350.F3C91B81E@shodan.nognu.de> <05233607@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <4464A2BF.6060108@mac.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 12 May 2006 10:59:11 -0400 Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 May 2006 12:53:50 +0200 Frank Steinborn wrote:
> >   
> >> If you *are* the maintainer of the port use [maintainer update],
> >> otherwise you should consider sending your patch to the maintainer
> >> directly or use at least [change-request].
> >
> > The phrase "If you are volunteering to maintain the port, be sure to
> > put [maintainer update] at the beginning of your synopsis line and set
> > the ``Class'' of your PR to maintainer-update." seems to tell quite
> > the opposite.

> Note that this is following the context set in the previous paragraph,
> which was:  "If the port is unmaintained, and you are actively using
> it yourself, please consider volunteering to become its maintainer."
> If you wish to become the maintainer of a port that is being
> maintained by nobody, aka ports@freebsd.org, using maintainer-update
> makes sense.

Sure. It was just my case.
BTW, the PR is already committed. Thanks, sem!

> If the port already has a maintainer, and you're not that person,
> using update or change-request seems more appropriate, unless you have
> coordinated the hand-off of maintainership already with the former
> maintainer and/or portmgr@.  Other people feel that you should not set
> the Class to maintainer-update until after the PR which assigns the
> maintainership to you has been committed.

Right you are.


WBR
-- 
Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer
InPharmTech Co,     http://www.ipt.ru
Telephone & Internet Service Provider



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?58836501>