Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 09:44:18 +0100 (CET) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Fabrizio=20Ravazzini?= <freefabri@yahoo.it> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: natd/ipfw VS ipnat/ipf Message-ID: <20011116084418.31914.qmail@web20106.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20011115101346.11165.qmail@web20105.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello,we've done a Nat/firewall between our
2 Lan and the Internet with natd & ipfw.
We've read somewhere that we can do the same thing
using ipnat & ipfilter (as is in openbsd), the
question is, why someone did so? is ipnat/ipf
faster than natd/ipfw ? or also ipf more "secure"
than ipfw?
We question this because our 2 Lan are composed of
about 200 machines, so some extra speed would be
appreciated.
thanks
INTERNET
|
|
|Public Ip0
_____|_________
| Router CISCO |
+------+--------+
|
|PublicIP1
+---------+
| NAT |
|Firewall |
+---------+
| |________LAN2 192.168.1.x
|
LAN1
10.0.0.x
______________________________________________________________________
Abbonati a Yahoo! ADSL con Atlanet!
Naviga su Internet ad alta velocitą, e senza limiti di tempo!
Per saperne di pił vai alla pagina http://adsl.yahoo.it
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011116084418.31914.qmail>