Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:06:35 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: gavin@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: standards/149980: [patch] negative value integer to nanosleep(2) should fail with EINVAL Message-ID: <20100831100635.GB2396@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <201008310921.o7V9Ljhp078995@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201008310921.o7V9Ljhp078995@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I do think that the change is not useful. It puts more burden on the application writers to check for the negative value before making the syscall. Also, it changes the API. Please, just close the PR.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100831100635.GB2396>