Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 25 Apr 2001 23:26:22 -0700
From:      Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org>
To:        "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc@imach.com>
Cc:        Dave VanAuken <dave@hawk-systems.com>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD w 3C905 cannot connect to/through Cisco 3524XL switch
Message-ID:  <20010425232622.A29316@rand.tgd.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104252022140.24749-100000@workhorse.iMach.com>; from "forrestc@imach.com" on Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at = 08:30:44PM
References:  <DBEIKNMKGOBGNDHAAKGNMEAPFCAA.dave@hawk-systems.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104252022140.24749-100000@workhorse.iMach.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--envbJBWh7q8WU6mo
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 08:30:44PM -0600, Forrest W. Christian wrote:
> I can't honestly say that the Intel is any better than the cheapies
> (I haven't had any problems to speak of with either one) but the
> Intel just "feels" a little better.

	If you get a box that's pushing more than 20Mbps of traffic,
it makes all the difference in the world in terms of dropped frames
and throughput, however, I can probably safely venture to guess that
most people will never push a single machine that hard in real life.
-sc


--=20
Sean Chittenden

--envbJBWh7q8WU6mo
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Sean Chittenden <sean@chittenden.org>

iEYEARECAAYFAjrnv44ACgkQn09c7x7d+q1ncACfTjPypvJkXoS5OBUNBu/PpcJy
RD4AoK7zjrDJufMo1Ocl+mQBSJQo7uNf
=t6yh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--envbJBWh7q8WU6mo--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010425232622.A29316>