Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:19:39 -0400 From: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> To: Marcelo Araujo <araujo@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Measuring ZFS configuration differences Message-ID: <FE942EF8-42CB-4B1C-8966-E78D94AE1E27@langille.org> In-Reply-To: <CAOfEmZjHD6%2Bw2Adfp4Z4uDwPSMDOZ12wZb7sr3vsVmMJ=pEm%2BA@mail.gmail.com> References: <8B37FEDC-218A-4071-8CB7-48361BB72B1D@langille.org> <CAOfEmZjHD6%2Bw2Adfp4Z4uDwPSMDOZ12wZb7sr3vsVmMJ=pEm%2BA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Oct 16, 2015, at 5:15 AM, Marcelo Araujo <araujobsdport@gmail.com> = wrote: >=20 > 2015-10-13 1:00 GMT+08:00 Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>: >=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> Any suggestions? >>=20 >>=20 > A list of "what we want to test" would be helpful. Maybe we can add it = at > the same wiki page? > Also, would be nice assign each test to someone that wants to perform = it. > As an example, I have my lab where I can make benchmarks in parallel = with > your lab, if we assign tasks we won't have duplicated tests(in case we > don't want it). >=20 > I will update soon the information about my LAB. I think these are all fine ideas. Running the same tests in more than one environment is good. If our = results can be reproduced, it means our methods and conclusions are valid. =E2=80=94=20 Dan Langille http://langille.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FE942EF8-42CB-4B1C-8966-E78D94AE1E27>