Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:18:02 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Dmitry Chagin <dchagin@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r189771 - in head/sys: amd64/amd64 amd64/linux32 arm/arm compat/ia32 compat/svr4 i386/i386 i386/linux ia64/ia64 kern mips/mips powerpc/powerpc sparc64/sparc64 sys Message-ID: <20090315161802.000034d2@unknown> In-Reply-To: <200903131640.n2DGep8f068001@svn.freebsd.org> References: <200903131640.n2DGep8f068001@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:40:51 +0000 (UTC) Dmitry Chagin <dchagin@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > New Revision: 189771 > Log: > Implement new way of branding ELF binaries by looking to a > ".note.ABI-tag" section. Does this mean we do not need brandelf for the linuxulator anymore (do static linux programs contain this field with a correct value)? If yes: - Please document it least in the doc repository in "en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.sgml" (version 800071 should be close enough, so just adding a little note there is enough). This way we can take this into account for the linux stuff in the ports collection. - I don't know if this should be mentioned in the brandelf man-page too in this case. At least the evaluation order should be mentioned there, I think. Bye, Alexander.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090315161802.000034d2>