Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 23:25:39 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-doc@freebsd.org" <freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>, Xin LI <delphij@freebsd.org>, "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com> Subject: Re: docs/184550: bc -q option not documented in man page Message-ID: <CAF6rxgm7qqE5cd-ax7=LipUGJpSA19ZJeJ1%2B_ZqpCqCfMU_cPw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20131207021835.GK20078@glenbarber.us> References: <201312070107.rB717SAW015758@freefall.freebsd.org> <CAF6rxgk50a0gL7_O3t=iFM-XGjnwam07ZNkOOgsWV=Tu7OKDXQ@mail.gmail.com> <20131207021835.GK20078@glenbarber.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 09:12:30PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: >> all options should be documented. An undocumented option is a bug. >> If we don't want people using it we should document as such. >> > > It is documented. > > case 'q': > /* compatibility option */ > break; Source code is not documentation. It it surprising to hear that, especially on this list. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgm7qqE5cd-ax7=LipUGJpSA19ZJeJ1%2B_ZqpCqCfMU_cPw>