Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 22:47:41 -0500 From: "Steve Friedrich" <SteveFriedrich@Hot-Shot.com> To: "D. Alex Neilson" <neilson@www.nugate.com>, "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: "Alex Neilson" <neilson@nugate.com> Subject: Re: route to host on directly attached network Message-ID: <199810290348.WAA22777@laker.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 28 Oct 98 19:11:00 PST, D. Alex Neilson wrote: >Route problem: Tell host 10.10.10.10 that host 10.10.11.11 > is directly reachable via interface vx1 > >If 10.10.11.11 has ethernet address 04:20:38:af:eb:4c, it'd be >kewl if this would work > > route add -host 10.10.11.11 04:20:38:af:eb:4c -interface vx1 > >but of course it doesn't. Can I avoid ifconfig-ing a 10.10.11.0-net >address into 10.10.10.10 to make it work? I've always used class C networks, but I think I understand IP addresses... This should work without any special considerations because the network is only the first octet, 10. Are you using the wrong netmask, like perhaps 255.255.255.0 instead of 255.0.0.0 ?? Unix systems measure "uptime" in years, Winblows measures it in minutes. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199810290348.WAA22777>