Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 08:56:06 +0200 From: Morten Rodal <morten@rodal.no> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: gcc/libm floating-point bug? Message-ID: <20030522065605.GA50010@atlantis.rodal.no> In-Reply-To: <20030522011014.GC27806@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200305201025.30296.jlido@goof.com> <200305201216.10964.jlido@goof.com> <20030520180004.GA2372@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <200305201512.27174.jlido@goof.com> <20030522011014.GC27806@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 06:10:14PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> Honest question of you -- I'll assume you're subscribed to
> freebsd-current@. How have you missed all the warnings from myself and
> others not to trust the -march=pentium4 optimizations? I honestly want
> to know so we can figure out a better way of getting the word out.
>
I am not going to discuss the removal of the -march=pentium4, but a
warning would be nice. Either in the form of the release notes or in
the make.conf, preferrable both.
As for the "missed all warnings [...]" I think this just proves that
it is necessary to document things like this. Also see the post about
a lot of new people trying out 5.0 for the first time and the troubles
they are having with getting help. Search for
Message-ID: <006d01c30f6c$3feb3690$6601a8c0@VAIO650>
posted in late April.
--
Morten Rodal
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE+zHSFbWe1Cy11WVsRAkE1AJ9+OmOWqlxTxeb24jA87lK13+SdZQCgo4iM
e12lxdkX/TPAs73kbeZYuAo=
=5I52
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030522065605.GA50010>