Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:30:30 +0900 From: "Kristof Provost" <kristof@sigsegv.be> To: "Marin Bernard" <lists@olivarim.com> Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Support for the enc(4) pseudo-interface Message-ID: <E8632919-4335-401A-8F6B-17D24A3F4447@sigsegv.be> In-Reply-To: <1490018913-f1619c15ef073d0f123d2a0940047986@olivarim.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 20 Mar 2017, at 23:08, Marin Bernard wrote: > Yet, it appears that pf is able to handle references to enc(4) in its > ruleset > even if the kernel does not support it. Is it expected behaviour? Is > it > safe to use such a configuration on a production machine ? > pf accepts rules for interfaces that don’t exist (yet), so this is expected, but it won’t do what you want it to do. Regards, Kristofhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E8632919-4335-401A-8F6B-17D24A3F4447>