Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 13:11:19 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 245773] lang/python3: Missing errno.EDEADLOCK Message-ID: <bug-245773-21822-eQk1zAs1kT@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-245773-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-245773-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245773 --- Comment #4 from Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl> --- (In reply to Gleb Popov from comment #3) >> But it would be a lot more conveinient if it did exist and worked as expected. > And what's expected in this case? I, for example, expect an undefined constant, because FreeBSD doesn't have EDEADLOCK code. On FreeBSD I would errno.EDEADLOCK to be 11.... Like I said, that does not fix the problem of the submitter. We can call it whatever we want, but fixing this will cause less python code to crash on first execution, where then the user dives into the python code and does something to handle the lack of. Be it comment it out, if-def-ignore or whatever. And yes you are probably correct in suggestiing that this might have a better place at the python code itself. (Not to speak of getting it in cython) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-245773-21822-eQk1zAs1kT>