Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 18:10:36 +0200 From: Emanuel Strobl <Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, Munehiro Matsuda <haro@h4.dion.ne.jp> Subject: Re: LOR with iwi and UMA on 7-current Message-ID: <200509041810.44390@harrymail> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0509041548010.93099@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <20050901.225149.41626079.haro@h4.dion.ne.jp> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0509041548010.93099@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1257774.85cQH49H3e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Sonntag, 4. September 2005 17:52 CEST schrieb Bjoern A. Zeeb: [...] > added this LOR with ID 150: > http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html#150 > > > lock order reversal > > 1st 0xc07a7060 ifnet (ifnet) @ net/if.c:1159 > > 2nd 0xc1f36b68 iwi0 (network driver) @ > > /home/haro/tmp/sys-7/modules/iwi/../../dev/iwi/if_iwi.c:1643 > > added with LOR ID 151: > http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html#151 > > > lock order reversal > > 1st 0xc22c2bb8 rtentry (rtentry) @ net/route.c:1269 > > 2nd 0xc1f36b68 iwi0 (network driver) @ > > /home/haro/tmp/sys-7/modules/iwi/../../dev/iwi/if_iwi.c:1587 > > added with LOR ID 152: > http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html#152 > > > lock order reversal > > 1st 0xc230a1f8 inp (tcpinp) @ netinet/tcp_usrreq.c:368 > > 2nd 0xc1f36b68 iwi0 (network driver) @ > > /home/haro/tmp/sys-7/modules/iwi/../../dev/iwi/if_iwi.c:1587 > > added with LOR ID 153: > http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html#153 > > though quite similar to LOR ID 128: > http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html#128 > > > lock order reversal > > 1st 0xc07a8a6c tcp (tcp) @ netinet/tcp_input.c:615 > > 2nd 0xc1f36b68 iwi0 (network driver) @ > > /home/haro/tmp/sys-7/modules/iwi/../../dev/iwi/if_iwi.c:1587 > > added with LOR ID 154: > http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/lor.html#154 Hello, are LockOrderReversal something to worry about? I ask because I see= =20 the list growing but it doesn't seem it's anything relevant for the=20 Release process, so I guess they can be ignored by non kernel devolpers.=20 Is this correct? If not, and LORs are serious errors, will 6.0 be shipped=20 with all these errors?!? Well those from this message were on 7.0, but I=20 guess the first hundred are in 6.0... Best regards, =2DHarry --nextPart1257774.85cQH49H3e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQBDGxyEBylq0S4AzzwRAn/uAJiS/opXNJiVrDWlmU/t8BMjQRgiAKCC7K6W X9Fj2alkuslpzp03PeHOPg== =V3ls -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1257774.85cQH49H3e--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200509041810.44390>