Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 05:20:46 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com> Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: swap-related problems Message-ID: <37179B9E.D4434460@newsguy.com> References: <000001be8842$6ef48410$021d85d1@whenever.youwant.to>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Schwartz wrote: > > > Sure. We call it limiting a process/user datasize. This solution is > > not more complicated than any other solution short of full > > pre-allocation, even if you do not believe so. > > You seem to be under the impression that I am looking for a _simple_ > solution. I am not. I am looking for a _good_ solution. And while > process/user datasize limits are certainly part of a solution, I think I've > already clearly demonstrated that they are not adequate. Feel free to submit patches. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "Well, Windows works, using a loose definition of 'works'..." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37179B9E.D4434460>