Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 12:02:26 +0200 From: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Intel X58 eSATA port ? Message-ID: <49C60CB2.9030101@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200903212323.n2LNN3La037490@lava.sentex.ca> References: <1237594983.00089764.1237583401@10.7.7.3> <49C4B848.1010906@mavhome.dp.ua> <200903211449.n2LEmxwC034905@lava.sentex.ca> <49C5292F.1050802@FreeBSD.org> <200903212149.n2LLnC94037010@lava.sentex.ca> <20090321222116.GG51533@evil.alameda.net> <200903212323.n2LNN3La037490@lava.sentex.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Tancsa wrote:
>> > atapci0@pci0:6:0:0: class=0x01018f card=0x4f538086
>> > chip=0x612111ab rev=0xb2 hdr=0x00
>> > vendor = 'Marvell Semiconductor (Was: Galileo Technology Ltd)'
>> > device = '6121 SATA2 Controller'
>> > class = mass storage
>> > subclass = ATA
>> > cap 01[48] = powerspec 2 supports D0 D1 D3 current D0
>> > cap 05[50] = MSI supports 1 message
>> > cap 10[e0] = PCI-Express 1 legacy endpoint
>>
>> I would try to run it as RAID, as per the technical product spec from
>> Intel it supports running single non-raid configs.
>
> No difference, the dmesg looks the same with RAID enabled
Not exactly:
> atapci0@pci0:6:0:0: class=0x01048f card=0x4f538086 chip=0x612111ab
> rev=0xb2 hdr=0x00
> subclass = RAID
was:
subclass = ATA
But it does not change anything.
--
Alexander Motin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49C60CB2.9030101>