Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 09 Nov 2003 18:58:54 -0500 (EST)
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Jens Rehsack <rehsack@liwing.de>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: New interrupt code slows hyperthreading down
Message-ID:  <XFMail.20031109185854.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <3FAC306D.6090903@liwing.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 07-Nov-2003 Jens Rehsack wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
> 
>> Thanks, IRQ 16 was programmed as level, activelo, so it wasn't an
>> off by one error there.  Grr.
> 
> I've seen, but I didn't found a bios option to set it to edge.
> Is there anything I can do on my machine to fix the problem, or
> should Asus be notified for a bios update or ...?

No, level is correct.  The APIC code doesn't mask edge triggered
interrupts, and if it thought IRQ 16 was edge rather than level,
that could explain the high interrupt rate.  Since that isn't the
case I'm not sure why it's triggering so many interrupts.

-- 

John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20031109185854.jhb>