Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 17:40:21 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 64 bit API/ABI changes proposal for -current Message-ID: <3D7404F5.B316FBA4@mindspring.com> References: <55509.1030995196@critter.freebsd.dk> <200209021942.g82JgIZn032728@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Dillon wrote: > Ok, we have an issue in regards to libc/user function visibility. > The bintime structures and functions are surrounded by __BSD_VISIBLE. > > The question to you and to the list in general is: what to call the > user-visible structure. 'bintime' is a cute name, I certainly like > it better then timeval64, and we could probably get away with calling > the user visible structure bintime, but I don't know if we can get > away with including all the supporting inline functions (not that we > necessarily have to include them for the syscall work, but it would > be nice). What do Linux, Solaris, SCO, etc. call it? Whatever it is, it should be the same, so that source code does not need to be "#if"'ed. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D7404F5.B316FBA4>