Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:35:52 +0200 From: Ed Schouten <ed@fxq.nl> To: VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu_bsd@zeninc.net> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, net@freebsd.org, Peter Blok <peter.blok@bsd4all.org>, FreeBSD current mailing list <current@freebsd.org>, "George V. Neville-Neil" <gnn@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FAST_IPSEC is now IPSEC, please be advised... Message-ID: <20070713123552.GW55449@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: <20070713072657.GA13945@zen.inc> References: <m24pkliso6.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> <FC126D427FFFE74988DAD93C091BF4A15FFD@adexlinge10.LINGE10.local> <m2fy3tb2su.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> <20070713053534.D31116@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <20070713072657.GA13945@zen.inc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--O2izrSG9ltmUPm45 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu_bsd@zeninc.net> wrote: > But if it is quite simple to fix for -HEAD, which now only have > netipsec/ipsec.h, it is harder to solve cleanly for older versions, > which have both netinet6/ipsec.h and netipsec/ipsec.h, and on which I > just don't know how to guess which one we should use. You could use the __FreeBSD_version definition to detect what version of FreeBSD people are using. I guess it has been bumped after the IPSEC import. --=20 Ed Schouten <ed@fxq.nl> WWW: http://g-rave.nl/ --O2izrSG9ltmUPm45 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGl3Gn52SDGA2eCwURAkLqAJ0e9ktUkyYLFc9SUFBNeYMT9MYW+ACeN66v T8KqKR+0xvw/Qxog1M6DPLc= =BM3I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --O2izrSG9ltmUPm45--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070713123552.GW55449>