Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 23 Sep 2012 16:37:10 -0700
From:      David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>
To:        Pedro Giffuni <pfg@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "stable@freebsd.org" <stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: rpc.lockd exiting just after startup @r240811
Message-ID:  <20120923233710.GU30766@albert.catwhisker.org>
In-Reply-To: <1348442353.1084.YahooMailNeo@web113510.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
References:  <20120923130414.GQ30766@albert.catwhisker.org> <20120923154349.GM37286@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20120923225021.GT30766@albert.catwhisker.org> <1348442353.1084.YahooMailNeo@web113510.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--VAM/tfeJyUfWz6bO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 04:19:13PM -0700, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Hello David;
>=20
> Sorry to have caused you trouble.

One of the reasons I call my laptop's kernel config file "CANARY"
is because I use it to check for danger. :-}

> ...
> > Since rpc.lockd seems OK on the systems running head, perhaps there
> > was an issue with the MFC?
> >=A0
>=20
> Both should have the same issue. It does depend on what kind of load
> your -current box is running, of course.

Sure -- but in this case, it's just a matter of whether or not the
machine acts as an NFS client.

> > I'll be happy to test further -- I just need a bit of guidance from
> > time to time. :-}
> >=A0
>=20
> What I can do is send you individual patches to see if we
> can narrow down the culprit. If I can avoid reverting all the
> change it will be better.

Of course; I saw that r240799 was a collection of individual changes.

> It will be a bit boring because you may have to build kernel
> and libc each time, so I would start with the most obvious
> candidates. For now just leave r240799 reverted.

OK.

Would it be OK for me to do the (usual, for me):

	make -DNOCLEAN -j 4 buildworld && make -DNOCLEAN -j 4 kernel

?

(I do all the work within script(1), so we have a record.)

If you have a patch, please send it & I'll give it a try.

Alternatively, if there's a useful way to build a debugging version of
rpc.lockd & run it under a debugger, maybe I could see what's going on?

Oh -- one other thing (before I forget again): I'm using clang:

freebeast(9.1-P)[1] cat /etc/src.conf=20
CC=3Dclang
CXX=3Dclang++
CPP=3Dclang-cpp
WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS=3Dyes
freebeast(9.1-P)[2]=20

Peace,
david
--=20
David H. Wolfskill				david@catwhisker.org
Depriving a girl or boy of an opportunity for education is evil.

See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.

--VAM/tfeJyUfWz6bO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAlBfnSUACgkQmprOCmdXAD3xzwCePjbXkcw5Awu32ldHC+S40C8d
SLsAnA6AxVU3IXUqKpig4/3mrmCJl1FR
=TUDD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VAM/tfeJyUfWz6bO--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120923233710.GU30766>