Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 May 2004 17:26:39 +0200
From:      Nicolas Rachinsky <list@rachinsky.de>
To:        Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Third "RFC" on on pkg-data ideas for ports
Message-ID:  <20040524152639.GA12607@pc5.i.0x5.de>
In-Reply-To: <p0602040dbcd716257540@[128.113.24.47]>
References:  <p0602040dbcd716257540@[128.113.24.47]>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> [2004-05-24 00:07 -0400]:
> The third proposal is basically:
>     a) move most "standard" files into a new pkg-data
>        file, as described in previous proposals, except
>        for pkg-descr and "patch" files.
>     b) create a new directory at the root directory of
>        the ports collection.  That directory would be
>        called "Patches", and inside would be a directory
>        for each category.  Inside each Patches/category
>        directory would be a single-file for each port
>        in that category, where that single-file would
>        have all the "ports-collection patches" for the
>        matching port.

I hoep I haven't missed something obvious, but what about local
patches and Makefile.local? Will they continue to work?

Nicolas



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040524152639.GA12607>