Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 20:08:58 +0200 From: Harry Schmalzbauer <freebsd@omnilan.de> To: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Is "-vlanhwcsum" without effect? [Was: Re: if_igb(4) VLAN(4) and [RT]XCSUM_IPV6, TSO6 Message-ID: <59271DBA.30907@omnilan.de> In-Reply-To: <59271B5C.7020306@omnilan.de> References: <58CAD8CB.3060101@omnilan.de> <283742a4-5314-eef3-ed53-958a1f6e7492@yandex.ru> <58E641B8.5050108@omnilan.de> <59271B5C.7020306@omnilan.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bezüglich Harry Schmalzbauer's Nachricht vom 25.05.2017 19:58 (localtime): > Bezüglich Harry Schmalzbauer's Nachricht vom 06.04.2017 15:25 (localtime): >> Bezüglich Andrey V. Elsukov's Nachricht vom 06.04.2017 14:56 (localtime): >>> On 16.03.2017 21:26, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I'm wondering if I really loose [RT]XCSUM_IPV6 on if_igb(4) vlan(4) >>>> children. >>>> My igb0 (Kawela, aka 82576) options end with >>>> "TSO6,VLAN_HWTSO,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6" >>>> >>>> The vlan(4) filtered interfaces show these: >>>> options=303<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,TSO4,TSO6> >>>> >>>> So TSO6 is inherited, but RC/TXCSUM_IPV6 dropped? >>> Can you test the attached patch? >> Great, thanks for your explanation and the patch. Unfortunately I won't >> be able to test before weekend. Will report asap. > Hello, > > thank you for your fix, which made it into stable/11 in the meantime, > where I can confirm it does work. > > But I noticed a possibly related oddity: > Setting "-vlanhwcsum" seems to have no effect, at least ifconfig(8) > reports always 'VLAN_HWCSUM'. And to complete today's discoverings of personal knwoledge deficiencies: ifconfig(8) reports "PPROMISC" doubled. Don't know if that's a special meaning or a cosmetic bug. Thanks, -harry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?59271DBA.30907>