Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 14:15:06 +0000
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: haskell@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 295675] lang/ghc{,96}: port to powerpc64
Message-ID: <bug-295675-16154-qsSoSM2iiw@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-295675-16154@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=295675 Gleb Popov <arrowd@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |arrowd@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Gleb Popov <arrowd@FreeBSD.org> --- I don't like the whole .if ${ARCH:Mpowerpc64*} && ${GHC_VERSION} == 9.6.7 BOOT_GHC_VERSION= 9.6.7 HADRIAN_BOOT_TARBALL= hadrian-9.6.7-boot-powerpc64le.tar.gz .endif block. It could've been avoided by switching all arches to use GHC 9.6.7 as a bootstrap compiler. But now it is committed I wouldn't bother. If I understand it correctly the +.if ${ARCH} == powerpc64 +# Boot's settings are generated by configure which maps `powerpc64` to ELF_V1, +# but FreeBSD ppc64 is ELFv2; flip so the boot's NCG dispatches correctly. + ${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's|ArchPPC_64 ELF_V1|ArchPPC_64 ELF_V2|g' \ + ${BOOT_INSTALL_DIR}/lib/ghc-${BOOT_GHC_VERSION}/lib/settings +.endif block could also be removed once we re-generate the bootstrap compiler distribution? If that's the case please add a comment like "can be removed after rerolling all the bootstraps" so that we can remember to remove this block at some point. Other than that, LGTM. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-295675-16154-qsSoSM2iiw>