Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:31:31 +0200 From: albi <albi@scii.nl> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: photoshop Message-ID: <20041026213131.GA13113@aseed.antenna.nl> In-Reply-To: <d9175cad04102614021e4f812@mail.gmail.com> References: <ef60af09041025123647cded21@mail.gmail.com> <417D8C33.6080605@nc.rr.com> <ef60af0904102521374f9c08ba@mail.gmail.com> <200410261518.47337.ekeberg@bigpond.net.au> <ef60af090410252311322b6627@mail.gmail.com> <d9175cad04102614021e4f812@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 04:02:14PM -0500, Eric Kjeldergaard wrote: > If I'm understanding this right -- then of course, both editors (gimp > and photoshop) deal with jpegs, gifs, bmps, etc...it doesn't do much > good in the Real World (TM) to use crazy proprietary formats because > browsers/etc simply can't render them. There's more than just pictures in browsers, if you want pictures to be printed by a professional printer then those printers usually like to have the "original" format, not just the jpg or png end-result. For Gimp it's .xcf and for Photo$hop it's .pdf. And .. Gimp can read .psd
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041026213131.GA13113>