Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 04:16:06 +0600 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Cc: David O'Brien <obrien@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/scripts print-cdrom-packages.sh Message-ID: <20031201221606.GA78852@regency.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <20031201033904.GD75620@elvis.mu.org> References: <20031201032205.GA41354@dragon.nuxi.com> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1031130222544.74465B-100000@fledge.watson.org> <20031201033904.GD75620@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 07:39:04PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> [031130 19:30] wrote: > > > > On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, David O'Brien wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 03:48:44PM -0800, Scott Long wrote: > > > > scottl 2003/11/29 15:48:44 PST > > > > > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > > > > > Modified files: > > > > release/scripts print-cdrom-packages.sh > > > > Log: > > > > vim-lite can hardly be considered 'lite'. Remove it. > > > > > > Why isn't it "lite"? > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 portmgr archive 2M Nov 18 01:09 vim-lite-6.2.139.tbz > > > > > > Lets look at the Emacs editors you left behind: > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 portmgr archive 11M Nov 21 17:21 emacs-21.3.tbz > > > > > > I predict you will become very unpopular for this commit. > > > Please remove Emacs instead. > > > > Maybe compared to vim, and both vim and vim-lite were previously on CD1? > > > > 2662422 vim-6.2.139.tbz > > 2195668 vim-lite-6.2.139.tbz > > vim-lite is really nice to have around and I have to agree... > wait... > anyone really tired of nvi?... and wants us to be a little more > like OS X? And let's not forget helping the children of Uganda... :) > > When are we going to replace nvi with vim-without-x11? Is this really that worth it? Speaking for myself, I'm perfectly happy with nvi, and had never felt like installing any of vim* ports. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031201221606.GA78852>