Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 20:16:25 +0200 (CEST) From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: dwcjr@inethouston.net Cc: will@physics.purdue.edu, obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG, jhb@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/automake Makefile distinfo pkg-plist Message-ID: <200110251816.f9PIGQ695537@Magelan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20011025122053.B26868@leviathan.inethouston.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25 Okt, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
>> > Maybe. How can anyone say anything until someone makes a list of what
>> > breaks. I want to know why so many ports are using autoconf and automake
>> > rather than used the included Makefile.in and configure. Are ports that
>> > use the GNU build system using autoconf+automake just because they are
>> > there?
Just stepping into the middle of the discussion. Some ports which break
with automake 1.5 just build fine if "aclocal; automake -a -f" is called
in WRKDIR after patching.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Speak softly and carry a cellular phone.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200110251816.f9PIGQ695537>