Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 22:00:07 +0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> To: Diane Bruce <db@db.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Kurt Lidl <lidl@pix.net> Subject: Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base Message-ID: <52556167.4030206@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20131008232251.GA47296@night.db.net> References: <201310082033.r98KXUgJ058127@slippy.cwsent.com> <5254718E.2000504@pix.net> <20131008232251.GA47296@night.db.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/9/13 7:22 AM, Diane Bruce wrote: > On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 04:56:46PM -0400, Kurt Lidl wrote: >> On 10/8/13 4:33 PM, Cy Schubert wrote: >>> In message <52542687.7000100@pix.net>, Kurt Lidl writes: >>>> On 10/8/13, Julian Elischer wrote: >>>>> On 10/7/13 11:06 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: >>>>>> On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 10:43:21PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: >>>>>>> Hey all, > Did it this morning > > http://people.FreeBSD.org/~db/rcs.tgz > > Or > > http://www.db.net/~db/rcs.tgz > > > It's up to core@ to decide what to do. > > > - Diane I think everyone knows my opinion.. I think we need an in-base *file* versioning tool .. and since many of us have RCS'd our /etc files, or have install scripts that use RCS it should be RCS.. I don't care WHICH RCS it is but it needs to be back in place by 10. and the easiest way of having it there in the mean while is jsut to revert the commit until the new one is ready.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52556167.4030206>