Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:35:47 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Nagy_L=c3=a1szl=c3=b3_Zsolt?= <gandalf@shopzeus.com>
To: Olivier Nicole <Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th>
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: {Spam?} Re: {Spam?} Re: Cannot test spamassassin, what is going on here?
Message-ID: <55F686E3.8060205@shopzeus.com>
In-Reply-To: <wu7io7do6nk.fsf@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th>
References: <wu7io7do6nk.fsf@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> But this is wrong, because the email is still identified as ham. But the live server has identified it as spam => still cannot test spamassassin. > The only test you show is a network test (DNSWL), you have no action on > the value returned by http://www.dnswl.org/, so it sould have returned > one result when the live test was run and a different value when you run > the manual test. > > At tmie of the manual test, it seems that the address tested is in the > white list, hence the message is classified as ham. > > As a rule of thumb, the value of network test should be regarded very > lightly when you run a single message multiple times, because they are > very likely to change. Yes, but the test message came from freebsd-questions. Right now I'm getting all of the mailing list emails with {Spam?} headers, and I get a HAM classification on any of them. Spam requires a score of 5.0 at least, and most of the messages I have tested manually scored -5.0. Network test might change, but this is definitely not the root of the problem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55F686E3.8060205>