Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 19:27:36 +0800 From: Denny Lin <dennylin93@hs.ntnu.edu.tw> To: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru> Cc: dougb@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Results of BIND RFC Message-ID: <20100402112736.GB4611@mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw> In-Reply-To: <4BB58AA6.1040600@yandex.ru> References: <4BB51B5B.1050606@FreeBSD.org> <20100401222404.77a14a02.stas@FreeBSD.org> <4BB58AA6.1040600@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 10:11:50AM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > On 02.04.2010 9:24, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > >While it certainly might make sense to drop BIND out of the base, I'm not > >sure dropping bind tools as well from it is the best decision. How hard > >it will be to continue maintaining bind tools inside the base (so the > >critical ones like dig and nslookup still will be available), while moving > >the rest of it (the server itself and supporting tools) to the port? > > Hi, All. > > I'm agree with Stas. If it is not so hard to maintain "bind-tools" in the > base, > It is very useful to still having them in base system. +1 here. Dig and some of the other tools are extremely useful and important, so it would be nice if they were in the base system instead of a separate port. -- Denny Lin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100402112736.GB4611>