Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:40:06 +0300 From: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> To: Brandon Gooch <jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Tsuyoshi Ozawa <ozawa@t-oza.net> Subject: Re: RFC: New event timers infrastructure Message-ID: <4C0E5646.1060007@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimBrBjtoIIp_wUWp-nanTdvCx6ppwxIEGZSKFco@mail.gmail.com> References: <4C0C1AE4.8050807@FreeBSD.org> <AANLkTimfyn0aCs7PFRHL8RONvg03_QVXK_90oy084IIx@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikyWXHYezBW1mAlTU0Oi_Z1qlPbAyZllux_wFSB@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimBrBjtoIIp_wUWp-nanTdvCx6ppwxIEGZSKFco@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brandon Gooch wrote: > Alexander, do you feel that the code is at a stage where meaningful > user testing can occur? I think yes. I've touched a lot of legacy code, so it would be nice to know what I may have broken. For example, i8254 and RTC drivers now more dependent on attaching to PnP/ACPI reported hardware. I am not sure if there still any legacy system which not doing that. The oldest system I have tested was P-III Celeron. Unluckily my small development SSD is too "large" for my Pentium board's BIOS. :) There is still work planned, but I hope it won't require major changes in already written code. -- Alexander Motin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C0E5646.1060007>