Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 16:21:23 -0700 From: "Ackerman, Tony" <tony.ackerman@intel.com> To: "Bruce M Simpson" <bms@spc.org>, <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org> Cc: tackerman@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: [PATCH] Make em(4) use device sysctl tree Message-ID: <2726872B7A674F489DDEFB72CE1F670D016EFB22@orsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce, Aren't the calls to sysctl_ctx_free() still required? Tony =20 -----Original Message----- From: Bruce M Simpson [mailto:bms@spc.org]=20 Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 3:21 PM To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Cc: tackerman@FreeBSD.org; freebsdnic@mailbox.cps.intel.com; mux@FreeBSD.org Subject: [PATCH] Make em(4) use device sysctl tree Here is a non-critical patch to bring em(4) into line with other drivers, by using the sysctl tree created for each device by the bus framework. Please review; Thanks. BMS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2726872B7A674F489DDEFB72CE1F670D016EFB22>