Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Mar 1996 10:00:13 -0500 (EST)
From:      Eric Chet <ec0@s1.GANet.NET>
To:        Jian-Da Li <jdli@FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: 2.2-960323-SNAP: ipfw problem
Message-ID:  <Pine.SOL.3.91.960325095339.14170A-100000@s1>
In-Reply-To: <199603251332.VAA00749@FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 25 Mar 1996, Jian-Da Li wrote:

> 
> 	Hi :
> 
> 	I just upgraded to 960323 from 960212, and my network was dead.
> 	After try&error for 2 hours, I found that if I add IPFW-related
> 	functions into kernel, my network will die even localhost.
> 	The problem is, my ipfw list is empty, it should not block any
> 	host.
	
	Hello
	The latest implementation of ipfw is to block everything if your
list is empty.  It makes sense, you put a firewall in place but you did
not tell it which ip's to not firewall.

Eric J. Chet (ejc@nasvr1.cb.att.com || ec0@ganet.net)
Lucent Technologies, Bell Labs Innovations
Columbus, Ohio 43213  RM 1E222




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOL.3.91.960325095339.14170A-100000>