Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 00:08:32 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: binutils bloat Message-ID: <199803140708.AAA11125@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 14 Mar 1998 14:11:49 %2B1100." <199803140311.OAA16205@cimlogic.com.au> References: <199803140311.OAA16205@cimlogic.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199803140311.OAA16205@cimlogic.com.au> John Birrell writes: : Are people going to object if we keep _all_ the binutils source in : src/contrib/binutils so that we can define a few things in /etc/make.conf : and get cross tools out of a `make world'? I'm all for it. That's one of the features of NetBSD and OpenBSD that I miss... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199803140708.AAA11125>