Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:21:34 -0800 (PST) From: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@tutopia.com> To: Eitan Adler <eitanadlerlist@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler?) Message-ID: <749382.92616.qm@web32702.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <61484.71762.qm@web32708.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20090111044448.GC5661@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <4969CC6D.6030707@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <496A8F45.7010400@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
( Sorry everyone about my email not wrapping text anymore :( ) ----- Original Message ---- > > I never took care about GPLv2 and v3 > > differences but know, this seems to come to relevance in some way. > > I don't seem to understand this. Why should gpl v3 affect the OS? The > output of the compiler isn't affected by the license. Is it? > Perhaps we just want to avoid trouble to our commercial co-developers: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FSF_vs._Cisco cheers, Pedro.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?749382.92616.qm>