Date: 27 Jan 2000 01:56:01 +0100 From: naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de (Christian Weisgerber) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: programmer's editor choice Message-ID: <86o531$1qmb$1@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de> References: <200001262222.QAA95197@freeside.fc.net> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001262305110.38868-100000@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> wrote: > I know vi is universal, but for your own use, have you tried VIM? I > would expect you have, but i thought i would ask. Vastly imporved > interface, Since vim stays mostly compatible with old vi, it can't have a vastly improved interface. At most, it can have an extended interface. > with multiple buffers and other emacs-like features. You are aware that *BSD ships with nvi as /usr/bin/vi, which is also quite an advance over old vi, and which also happens to support multiple buffers--aren't you? -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86o531$1qmb$1>