Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:26:34 PDT From: Dieter <freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Ubuntu - Discuss... Message-ID: <200909290226.CAA28246@sopwith.solgatos.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:46:53 EDT." <cone.1254181613.595484.57677.1000@zoraida.natserv.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <cone.1254181613.595484.57677.1000@zoraida.natserv.net>, Francisco Reyes writes: > Steven Hartland writes: > > > Just noticed the following posted on phoronix: > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_ubuntu910&num=1 > > Comments? > > This was discussed in detail in slashdot.. starting with the fact that most > likely debug switches were not turned off for FreeBSD. "All of the FreeBSD and Ubuntu options were left at their defaults." My question is why is FreeBSD's disk i/o performance so bad? Not just in the benchmarks with debugging on, but in real world usage where it actually matters.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200909290226.CAA28246>