Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 19:55:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Brian Tao <taob@io.org> To: Kenneth Merry <ken@ulc199.residence.gatech.edu> Cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Is "routed -q" necessary? Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.92.960630195358.18686K-100000@zap.io.org> In-Reply-To: <199606302111.RAA23445@ulc199.residence.gatech.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 30 Jun 1996, Kenneth Merry wrote:
>
> It depends on what your network setup looks like. If you control all
> the machines on your subnet, there's no problem with running routed
> -q.
Since I only have one default router anyway, there is no need to
run routed at all? I figured it might help keep the routing tables
down to a manageable size, with static and dynamic IP connections
coming and going all the time.
--
Brian Tao (BT300, taob@io.org, taob@ican.net)
Systems and Network Administrator, Internet Canada Corp.
"Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.92.960630195358.18686K-100000>