Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 00:50:37 +0000 (GMT) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: Brian Feldman <green@unixhelp.org> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>, "Richard Seaman, Jr." <dick@tar.com>, Jeremy Lea <reg@shale.csir.co.za>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Subject: Re: Using LinuxThreads Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.01.9901230049560.59627-100000@herring.nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901221128200.9677-100000@janus.syracuse.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Brian Feldman wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Doug Rabson wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 21 Jan 1999, Richard Seaman, Jr. wrote: > > > > > > > > And when are COMPAT_LINUX_THREADS and VM_STACK going away? > > > > > > > > I have no idea. I was hoping that at least COMPAT_LINUX_THREADS > > > > would go away before the branch. I don't have commit authority, > > > > so it isn't up to me. > > > > > > > > > > hmm did you send me the patches? > > > > > > I can certainly do it now..(given a patch set to apply) > > > > > > I just realised however, that if we make them go away we break > > > SMP right? > > > hmm I guess we only break it for programs that woudltry use it > > > which should be none if you run SMP :-) > > > > It doesn't break SMP (I'm running an SMP kernel with > > COMPAT_LINUX_THREADS). All that happens is that linux_clone() returns > > an error. Surprisingly StarOffice still works fairly well. > > StarOffice 5.0? Is this with Luoqi's shared process across SMP patches? I don't have Luoqi's patches. StarOffice seems to work even if there is no thread support. Wierd. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 442 9037 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.01.9901230049560.59627-100000>