Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 06:26:20 -0800 From: Rob Farmer <rfarmer@predatorlabs.net> To: akosela@andykosela.com Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Allegations regarding OpenBSD IPSEC Message-ID: <AANLkTin8B44S5Nbz7SOK=muiH2xB4eXv33zzJdxfmPRN@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4d08a854.w8rPywliRhHs/MXH%akosela@andykosela.com> References: <4d08a854.w8rPywliRhHs/MXH%akosela@andykosela.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 03:36, Andy Kosela <akosela@andykosela.com> wrote: > > Some of you probably already read this: > > =A0http://marc.info/?l=3Dopenbsd-tech&m=3D129236621626462&w=3D2 > > Interesting...I wonder what is the impact of all this on FreeBSD code. > We may very well suppose that any government or corporation funded code > can theoretically have some kind of backdoor inside. If his allegations are correct, they should be easy to verify. He could post a copy of the NDA and a Freedom of Information Act request could be submitted to verify it. If, as claimed, the NDA expired and this can be discussed freely by the general public, then they would not be able to deny the request. --=20 Rob Farmer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTin8B44S5Nbz7SOK=muiH2xB4eXv33zzJdxfmPRN>