Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 20:43:00 +0100 From: Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl> To: "John W. O'Brien" <john@saltant.com> Cc: FreeBSD Python List <freebsd-python@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Proposal: default to concurrent Message-ID: <20170130194300.GA77462@slackbox.erewhon.home> In-Reply-To: <0b140bdf-d2f1-7910-9a49-5539ad3162cc@saltant.com> References: <b331f7bb-f258-e157-45bb-20cec74b54f0@saltant.com> <20170130005036.GA72122@slackbox.erewhon.home> <0b140bdf-d2f1-7910-9a49-5539ad3162cc@saltant.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--5vNYLRcllDrimb99
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 08:26:27PM -0500, John W. O'Brien wrote:
> Thank you for your input.
>=20
> On 1/29/17 19:50, Roland Smith wrote:
> [...]
> > There also seems to be a trend of separate py3-* ports. This is sometim=
es a
> > much better solution than trying to make a single port support python 2=
and 3.
>=20
> If I am not mistaken, the purpose of the py3-* ports is mainly to
> deliver some python3 support via the default build and thence the
> official pkg repository. As a convenience for those of who build our own
> ports, it also enables 2+3 support within a single build instead of
> having to coordinate multiple builds and maintain multiple repositories.
There are more issues with building the same port for two different python
versions. The #!-line will be different which leads to daily warnings about
mismatching checksums.
> Sadly, I don't see how it would address this pain point. Even with
I didn't mean to imply it was. I just thought them very useful.
> py-SPAM and py3-SPAM, or py2-SPAM and py-SPAM, concurrent *installation*
> still requires that the intersection of plists is the empty set.
To achieve this, any scripts/binaries installed by a Python package would
*always* have to be suffixed. Personally, I don't mind since basically every
shell has tab-completion.
Maybe we should just suffix *all* python-based scripts, and *don't* install=
a
suffix-less one? That would certainly make things clear (explicit even ;-).
But as others have mentioned, it might not be what some people expect.
Could we add an automatic extra to the pkg-message, like:
To enable the installation of package FOO for multiple Python versions,
the script BAR has been installed for Python-X.Y as BAR-X.Y.
> Furthermore, concurrent installation is useful for multiple minor
> versions of python3, not just python2.7 plus python3.x.
So suffixes it is, then?
Roland
--=20
R.F.Smith http://rsmith.home.xs4all.nl/
[plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated]
pgp: 5753 3324 1661 B0FE 8D93 FCED 40F6 D5DC A38A 33E0 (keyID: A38A33E0)
--5vNYLRcllDrimb99
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=5nkK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--5vNYLRcllDrimb99--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170130194300.GA77462>