Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2) 
Date:      Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:13:01 +0000 (UTC)
From:      Qing Li <qingli@FreeBSD.org>
To:        src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   svn commit: r201285 - head/sys/netinet
Message-ID:  <200912302213.nBUMD1PA073808@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help 
Author: qingli
Date: Wed Dec 30 22:13:01 2009
New Revision: 201285
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/201285

Log:
  Consolidate the route message generation code for when address
  aliases were added or deleted. The announced route entry for
  an address alias is no longer empty because this empty route
  entry was causing some route daemon to fail and exit abnormally.
  
  MFC after:	5 days

Modified:
  head/sys/netinet/in.c

Modified: head/sys/netinet/in.c
==============================================================================
--- head/sys/netinet/in.c	Wed Dec 30 21:51:23 2009	(r201284)
+++ head/sys/netinet/in.c	Wed Dec 30 22:13:01 2009	(r201285)
@@ -950,6 +950,49 @@ in_ifinit(struct ifnet *ifp, struct in_i
 #define rtinitflags(x) \
 	((((x)->ia_ifp->if_flags & (IFF_LOOPBACK | IFF_POINTOPOINT)) != 0) \
 	    ? RTF_HOST : 0)
+
+/*
+ * Generate a routing message when inserting or deleting 
+ * an interface address alias.
+ */
+static void in_addralias_rtmsg(int cmd, struct in_addr *prefix, 
+    struct in_ifaddr *target)
+{
+	struct route pfx_ro;
+	struct sockaddr_in *pfx_addr;
+	struct rtentry msg_rt;
+
+	/* QL: XXX
+	 * This is a bit questionable because there is no
+	 * additional route entry added/deleted for an address
+	 * alias. Therefore this route report is inaccurate.
+	 */
+	bzero(&pfx_ro, sizeof(pfx_ro));
+	pfx_addr = (struct sockaddr_in *)(&pfx_ro.ro_dst);
+	pfx_addr->sin_len = sizeof(*pfx_addr);
+	pfx_addr->sin_family = AF_INET;
+	pfx_addr->sin_addr = *prefix;
+	rtalloc_ign_fib(&pfx_ro, 0, 0);
+	if (pfx_ro.ro_rt != NULL) {
+		msg_rt = *pfx_ro.ro_rt;
+
+		/* QL: XXX
+		 * Point the gateway to the new interface
+		 * address as if a new prefix route entry has 
+		 * been added through the new address alias. 
+		 * All other parts of the rtentry is accurate, 
+		 * e.g., rt_key, rt_mask, rt_ifp etc.
+		 */
+		msg_rt.rt_gateway = 
+			(struct sockaddr *)&target->ia_addr;
+		rt_newaddrmsg(cmd, 
+			      (struct ifaddr *)target,
+			      0, &msg_rt);
+		RTFREE(pfx_ro.ro_rt);
+	}
+	return;
+}
+
 /*
  * Check if we have a route for the given prefix already or add one accordingly.
  */
@@ -997,40 +1040,7 @@ in_addprefix(struct in_ifaddr *target, i
 				IN_IFADDR_RUNLOCK();
 				return (EEXIST);
 			} else {
-				struct route pfx_ro;
-				struct sockaddr_in *pfx_addr;
-				struct rtentry msg_rt;
-
-				/* QL: XXX
-				 * This is a bit questionable because there is no
-				 * additional route entry added for an address alias.
-				 * Therefore this route report is inaccurate. Perhaps
-				 * it's better to supply a empty rtentry as how it
-				 * is done in in_scrubprefix().
-				 */
-				bzero(&pfx_ro, sizeof(pfx_ro));
-				pfx_addr = (struct sockaddr_in *)(&pfx_ro.ro_dst);
-				pfx_addr->sin_len = sizeof(*pfx_addr);
-				pfx_addr->sin_family = AF_INET;
-				pfx_addr->sin_addr = prefix;
-				rtalloc_ign_fib(&pfx_ro, 0, 0);
-				if (pfx_ro.ro_rt != NULL) {
-					msg_rt = *pfx_ro.ro_rt;
-					/* QL: XXX
-					 * Point the gateway to the given interface
-					 * address as if a new prefix route entry has 
-					 * been added through the new address alias. 
-					 * All other parts of the rtentry is accurate, 
-					 * e.g., rt_key, rt_mask, rt_ifp etc.
-					 */
-					msg_rt.rt_gateway = 
-						(struct sockaddr *)&ia->ia_addr;
-					rt_newaddrmsg(RTM_ADD, 
-						      (struct ifaddr *)target,
-						      0, &msg_rt);
-					RTFREE(pfx_ro.ro_rt);
-				}
-
+				in_addralias_rtmsg(RTM_ADD, &prefix, target);
 				IN_IFADDR_RUNLOCK();
 				return (0);
 			}
@@ -1099,20 +1109,6 @@ in_scrubprefix(struct in_ifaddr *target)
 		arp_ifscrub(target->ia_ifp, IA_SIN(target)->sin_addr.s_addr);
 	}
 
-	if ((target->ia_flags & IFA_ROUTE) == 0) {
-		struct rtentry rt;
-
-		/* QL: XXX
-		 * Report a blank rtentry when a route has not been
-		 * installed for the given interface address.
-		 */
-		bzero(&rt, sizeof(rt));
-		rt_newaddrmsg(RTM_DELETE, 
-			      (struct ifaddr *)target,
-			      0, &rt);
-		return (0);
-	}
-
 	if (rtinitflags(target))
 		prefix = target->ia_dstaddr.sin_addr;
 	else {
@@ -1121,6 +1117,11 @@ in_scrubprefix(struct in_ifaddr *target)
 		prefix.s_addr &= mask.s_addr;
 	}
 
+	if ((target->ia_flags & IFA_ROUTE) == 0) {
+		in_addralias_rtmsg(RTM_DELETE, &prefix, target);
+		return (0);
+	}
+
 	IN_IFADDR_RLOCK();
 	TAILQ_FOREACH(ia, &V_in_ifaddrhead, ia_link) {
 		if (rtinitflags(ia))

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200912302213.nBUMD1PA073808>