Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 09:43:38 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Where should I put ar71xx_* modules? Message-ID: <CAJ-VmokUJ5aw7ykn1ROqvv6cSDELL-YhenAe2_VxP4UPSe--Ng@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201201090757.29250.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <CAJ-Vmom08uFV%2BNMryjZon_xnqo95MAK8r2=0s_JqRet7EMdn4g@mail.gmail.com> <DFFFE611-01A1-4B3F-8DFF-72E410483D5D@lassitu.de> <CAJ-Vmo=peK%2BA%2BTnLVRZvf0TVSnCBisXRRpKgV%2BpwC-qL3-PABQ@mail.gmail.com> <201201090757.29250.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9 January 2012 04:57, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > Were you planning on including them in the ar71xx kernel configs via > MODULES_OVERRIDE or some such? =A0If so, that would be sufficient to get > 'make tinderbox' to cover them at least (and hopefully tinderbox builds). > In that case I think it is fine to not have them hooked up in the main > sys/modules build. =A0Or rather, if Warner commits his KERNOPTS thing, pe= rhaps > you could make sys/modules/Makefile include them on appropriate SoC kerne= ls > only. Yup that was the plan - include them in MODULES_OVERRIDE for the appropriate kernels. Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmokUJ5aw7ykn1ROqvv6cSDELL-YhenAe2_VxP4UPSe--Ng>