Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2018 21:59:44 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208130] smbfs is slow because it (apparently) doesn't do any caching/buffering Message-ID: <bug-208130-3630-4550PHc4EK@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-208130-3630@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-208130-3630@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208130 --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org> --- (In reply to noah.bergbauer from comment #3) Yes, all of these seem like bad options unfortunately. There is a FUSE SMB which may support newer versions of SMB and have block caching. Even with additional round-trips between kernel and user, it may be faster than sendi= ng every single 1kB request out to the network. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-208130-3630-4550PHc4EK>