Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 21:01:50 +0100 From: Cliff Sarginson <cliff@raggedclown.net> To: FreeBSD Mailing List Info <fbsd@vta.com> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux -vs-FreeBSD Message-ID: <20010123210150.A1409@raggedclown.net> In-Reply-To: <200101231656.LAA78845@mailhub.vta.com>; from fbsd@vta.com on Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 11:56:43AM -0500 References: <200101231656.LAA78845@mailhub.vta.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Do you not think your abusive disdain for Linux users is better kept to yourself ? Many people, including myself, happily use both, and this sort of mindless nastiness is completely unecessary in this list. Cliff On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 11:56:43AM -0500, FreeBSD Mailing List Info wrote: > > > Yep, from copious use of UTSL[ 1 ], the rpc.statd(8) manpage, the red-hat-weenie > web site (www.redhat.com/support/erratta/RHSA-2000-043-03.html), the particle > physics guys ( www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2000-17.html), and an old usenet- > archived message from one of our own highly esteemed community, > ( archives.neohapsis.com/freebsd/2000-08/0163.html), I sort-of came to > the conclusion that my portmapper and rpc ports should be monitored for > a while. Thus I'm pretty sure that's what's filling up the logs. > > The FreeBSD art I'd like to see is Chuck roasting Tux on the end of > the pitchfork, over a stack of burining $Msoft cd-roms and red hats. > Hmm, dinner, roast pengin-kabob , then back to work. [ 2 ]. > > [ 1 ]. Use The Source, Luke. > [ 2 ]. Although, I have to admit, some of the tiny embedded Linux solutions > seem to pretty good, so maybe Chuck doesn't eat the hors d'ouvres. > > > > >On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 10:48:50AM -0500, FreeBSD Mailing List Info wrote: > >> One big diffrence I have discovered is that SUSE and Debian users > >> appear to be much smarter that the Red Hat weenies, who apparently haven't > >> figured out that this rpc.statd exploit, which will make many Red Hat machines > >> wide open to being rooted, just doesn't work on FreeBSD. I have yet to point > >> Netcraft ( or other methods ) back at one of these silly bastards and not find > >> out that they are Red Hat propeller-heads. > >[...] > >> Jan 23 01:06:33 not_a_linux_weenie /kernel: ipfw: X000 Count TCP 204.185.158.217:4808 XXX.XXX.XXX.X:111 in via mx0 > > > >Is that what all the recent activity has been about on port 111? Of late > >I'm getting hit on 111 more often than even 27374. > > > >-- > >David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@hiwaay.net (hm) > >====================================================================== > >The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its > >capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010123210150.A1409>