Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 19:58:46 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: libm binary compat still broken (diablo-jdk does not run) Message-ID: <20040701025846.GA17625@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040701024801.GA28789@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <40DDEADA.7000102@obsecurity.org> <20040701020854.GA16944@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040701024801.GA28789@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 07:48:01PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 07:08:54PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Changing subject line to attract more attention. > >=20 > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 02:30:02PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > Looks like libm binary compatibility with 4.x was never quite fixed := -( > > >=20 > libm compatibility has been broken for years. See my rant > from a few years ago about needing to bump the major > version to libm.so.3. >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=3D210551+212876+/usr/local/ww= w/db/text/2002/freebsd-current/20021222.freebsd-current Yeah, hence "still". Kris --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA433lWry0BWjoQKURAiYuAJ9s79662UvcFL+rpUYb6iUKtfMtnACcC7tT ktWre7bompNnY2G/rggpPR8= =jB8P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040701025846.GA17625>