Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 06:25:34 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 262007] [ipfw] incorrectly rejects rules with dashed service names as an "unrecognised option" Message-ID: <bug-262007-227-P0gJWUUWKl@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-262007-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-262007-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D262007 Bertrand Petit <bsdpr@phoe.frmug.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Closed Resolution|--- |Works As Intended --- Comment #2 from Bertrand Petit <bsdpr@phoe.frmug.org> --- (In reply to Freddy DISSAUX from comment #1) Thank you Freddy, your comment is helpful. I've obviously missed that part = of the manual page. Since I use an in-house-made pre-processor to build ipfw rulesets, I've now provided an interface to lookup for port numbers, service names are no longer submitted to ipfw. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-262007-227-P0gJWUUWKl>