Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 18:21:55 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net>, Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@unixdaemons.com>, Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha busdma_machdep.c src/sys/alpha/osf1 imgact_osf1.c osf1_misc.c src/sys/cam cam_periph.c cam_sim.c cam_xpt.c src/sys/cam/scsi scsi_cd.c scsi_ch.c scsi Message-ID: <20030122022155.GO42333@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20030122020826.87F7F2A7EA@canning.wemm.org> References: <20030121205616.I46974-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> <20030122020826.87F7F2A7EA@canning.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> [030121 18:08] wrote: > Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > > Ok, I looked at the diff/commit a little closer. What I suggest we do is > > this: > > > > Leave M_WAITOK defined. This way we keep the ABI and API the same for > > 5.0. In 6.0 go ahead and remove it. New code should not use this 'flag'. > > Slight variation. Can we make M_WAITOK and the other not-a-flag flags > ifdef'ed under KLD_MODULE or something? That way we can reduce some of the > avoidable pain with 3rd party external modules, and still get to be sure > that our own house (src/sys/*) is kept clean. That's fine with me, I wish there was a way to do #ifused M_WAITOK #warning ... though. :) I agree with your follow-up that people should be able to suck it up with thier deltas though and deal with it without much of a problem. -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030122022155.GO42333>