Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 11:15:56 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@puchar.net> To: Antranig Vartanian <antranigv@freebsd.am> Cc: Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>, =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Goran_Meki=E6?= <meka@tilda.center> Subject: Re: The Case for Rust (in the base system) Message-ID: <a1a064e5-c968-b57-c87-f9fafac7bf@puchar.net> In-Reply-To: <CAFF117C-4E6B-4339-8A9A-391ED720C508@freebsd.am> References: <CAOtMX2hAUiWdGPtpaCJLPZB%2Bj2yzNw5DSjUmkwTi%2B%2BmyemehCA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFF117C-4E6B-4339-8A9A-391ED720C508@freebsd.am>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I don’t want to do a what-aboutism, but if all we’re looking for is a good and > secure system programming language, the alternatives are nicer. The is no such thing as secure system programming language. Security come only from proper programming practices.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a1a064e5-c968-b57-c87-f9fafac7bf>