Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 11:37:31 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: readv: parallel or sequential? Message-ID: <4109.1197027451@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 07 Dec 2007 12:39:56 %2B0100." <fjbb3v$n60$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <fjbb3v$n60$1@ger.gmane.org>, Ivan Voras writes: >Does this mean that, in effect, readv() is just a loop of read() calls >(minus syscall overhead)? It's more correct to say that read() is just a readv() with a single iovec. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4109.1197027451>